2007 was characterized by the raising of anti-immigrant sentiments by a vocal and seemingly influential minority group in Henderson County. This reaction found official expression in the formation and meetings of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Illegal Immigration, a group of concerned citizens charged with the responsibility to assess the impact of “illegal” immigration  at the local level.  This situation opened a door of opportunity for our organization to become a clear and strong voice advocating for the community. These are excerpts of the recommendations that the Latino Advocacy Coalition presented, in a letter to the Committee, on behalf of the Latino Community:

Recommendations to be considered 
for the final report of the 
Blue Ribbon Committee 

By Patrick Tappia

Some of the main issues affecting our local immigrant community which have come to the surface during this committee’s meetings are: the impossibility of obtaining drivers licenses by undocumented residents while the Sheriff’s office takes steps to implement program 287(g), the lack of housing codes to ensure the safety and fair treatment of all county residents, the need for programs and services that ensure a positive integration of the immigrant community into America’s fabric at the county level, and the lack of cultural awareness, ignorance and fear factors regarding diversity in Henderson County. The following are my recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners on these issues: 

1. Regarding the Sheriff’s Office 287(g) Program:

HPD officers already detain suspected illegal immigrants involved in drug sales and other crimes.  Even in those cases where ICE does not issue a detainer, HPD can detain the person for the state criminal law violation subject to a bond being set for release. The Office of the Sheriff does not need a special program nor more faculties to focus their effo

2007 was characterized by the raising of anti-immigrant sentiments by a vocal and seemingly influential minority group in Henderson County. This reaction found official expression in the formation and meetings of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Illegal Immigration, a group of concerned citizens charged with the responsibility to assess the impact of “illegal” immigration  at the local level.  This situation opened a door of opportunity for our organization to become a clear and strong voice advocating for the community. These are excerpts of the recommendations that the Latino Advocacy Coalition presented, in a letter to the Committee, on behalf of the Latino Community:

rts on violations of criminal law. As they have done in the past, they should continue to address illegal immigration associated with violations of criminal law. 

The 287(g) Program is an extravagant apparatus to rid the community of criminals. According to a report prepared by nine major cities chiefs of police departments on this program (“M.C.C. Immigration Committee Recommendations for Enforcement of Immigration Laws By Local Police Agencies,” June 2006),  the following are negatives that have to be considered as local police agencies think about engaging in implementing 287(g): 

a) This program undermines trust and cooperation of immigrant communities.

b) Lack of local police agencies’ resources.

c) Police officers are ill prepared to deal with the complexity of federal immigration law. 

d) Lack of local authority and state law limitations of authority. 

e) Risk of civil liability. 

Since the sheriff’s office is already detaining suspected illegal immigrants involved in drug traffic and other crimes and considering all the negatives that come with the 287(g) package, my position is to withhold support for the 287(g) program. Far from alleviating the taxpayer from the cost generated by illegal immigration, this program will increase it while imposing a heavy burden on our police force, already stretched too thin, to provide the services the community needs under the pressure of insufficient funds. Nevertheless since the majority of this Committee seems to support the Sheriff’s initiative on 287(g), I offer the following amendment to be added to Recommendation #2. 

Amendment to Recommendation #2:

  • The BOC should, by way of a written document, encourage the Sheriff’s Department to be very clear and open about what violations trigger 287(g) interventions, to act consistently with their public statements to the Latino community on the subject and to ensure that the program is used to remove serious threats to public safety rather than allow it to become an indiscriminate threat to all  immigrants. 

2. Regarding Driver Licenses:

To all the above negatives provided by the “M.C.C. Immigration Committee Recommendations for Enforcement of Immigration Laws,” we should add the issue of drivers’ licenses not being available to undocumented residents.  The outdated and broken system of immigration law does not provide a way for long term Hendersonville Latino residents to regularize their immigration status either. Regardless all of these limitations, the need to put food on the table will compel any responsible parent to drive without a license anyway. Thanks to the 287(g) program, hard working, family committed and head of household immigrants who do not have criminal records will become engaged in a deportation process after being fined for driving without a license two or three times. This will create a whirlpool of undesired effects whose costs will have to be absorbed by the taxpayer, such as the burden on DSS to relocate thousands of children after their parents have been deported.

Furthermore, it is necessary to assess current needs in the county for public transportation as an alternative method of mobility for residents who would prefer not to drive.

The first recommendation that follows bridges, in a reasonable step, the desire of this Committee to secure the taxpayer from the social, financial, and criminal costs of illegal immigration, and the recognition given by the same Committee regarding the economic contributions made by the undocumented workforce in this county. A similar initiative has been adopted by the City of New Haven, CT, whose officials overwhelmingly approved an ID card program last month in a 25 to 1 vote. In this case, Yale University Law School based in New Haven, helped research the city's idea and volunteered legal services. An effort like this will embody the expressed recognition, by this committee, that the problem is not the individuals who lack documentations but the Gordian knot of illegal immigration as a whole, which has not been effectively addressed by Congress and other federal agencies funded by the taxpayer to do the job. 

Recommendations:

  • Consider issuing ID cards to and registering those undocumented immigrants with no criminal records, who have a paying job and pay taxes (via the W-2 process).
  • Consider extending public transportation routes to better serve the origin/destination needs of the immigrant community as a whole. Encourage carpooling with a centralized informational structure that makes it feasible. 

3. Regarding Housing:

During the course of our investigation and hearing of testimonies provided by individuals working on housing issues, it has become evident that Henderson Co. presents deficiencies related to a housing code. It is unclear to me whether Henderson Co. has one and if so, whether that code is being enforced. The mention of numerous dangerous situations generated by overly intensive habitation of housing or the habitation of otherwise condemned dwellings should be of concern. No resident of Henderson Co. should be living in infrahuman housing conditions. Therefore, the eradication of such accommodations should be deemed of high importance. 

Recommendation:

  • Discourage substandard or overly intensive habitation of housing by a combination of appropriate housing code measures and enforcement of same. 

4. Regarding the Integration of the Immigrant Community:

Blue Ribbon Committee meetings have revealed a great a need in Henderson Co. for the implementation of cultural awareness training for public employees and service agencies staff in order to dispel misconceptions and provide nondiscriminatory service to all residents. 

The debate on illegal immigration undertaken by this Committee has also evidenced the need the community at large faces regarding cultural diversity. This could well include a class topic on the subject taught in the public schools to all students. Both racial minorities/ethnicities and the vastly white community in this county could benefit from such an educational campaign, which should also include the fostering and revival of American values. Focusing on strengthening the core values inherent in being an American could prove a positive resolution with the potential of bearing great fruit. 

Recommendation:

  • Implement cultural awareness training for public employees and service agencies staff in order to dispel misconceptions and provide nondiscriminatory service to all residents. Assure that issues of cultural diversity are included at all levels of the public schools’ curriculum.

Respectfully submitted, 

Patrick Tapia